
RENO, Nev.–Nuclear energy has always been a hot topic in Nevada. Since 1978, Yucca Mountain has been studied by the Department of Energy to determine whether it is suitable as a viable repository for the nation’s nuclear waste. Because of heavy political opposition of storing nuclear waste in Nevada, plans to open the facility have been greatly delayed. Nevada Senator Harry Reid is a main adversary to the Yucca Mountain project, stating “Hell no, that won’t happen.”
The controversy around Yucca Mountain for holding nuclear waste stems from a mangled history as well as a flawed understanding. Most of those against Yucca are concerned of safety and health issues that come from the radioactive waste. However many of these are widely ill informed myths as well.
The most common argument against the Yucca Mountain project is the much uncertainty of the safety of it as a repository for radioactive waste. Because of it’s location, many worry about the high rate of seismic activity in the area. Also, because there is a water table deep underground, many fear the water being contaminated as well. Both of these concerns have been addressed by the Department of Energy’s research. They have stated in their report that because of the engineered barrier system, it has been designed to protect from both heavy earthquakes and water seepage. However, because of the nature of nuclear power and it’s enormous decay rate, people still fear that it is too risky to take any action at this point. Due to strong political opposition, the president wrote a Memorandum to the Secretary of Energy to study possible alternatives.
On March 3, 2010, the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future was created. The panel of experts was organized in order to create a report on alternatives to Yucca by 2012. Despite attempts to slow the project, the Nuclear Waste Policy Act has already designated Yucca Mountain as a permanent repository for the nation’s nuclear waste. Unless this federal law is amended, plans to completely shut down the project would be illegal. If it is found out that Yucca Mountain is indeed unsafe for the project to be finished, a new alternative must be found, as it is the federal government’s obligation to create a nuclear waste repository for the nation.
Despite those against the Yucca project, many advocates still fight for the nuclear waste site’s completion. Former Nevada Governor Robert List has been pushing for the project for nearly a decade. Newly elected Assemblyman Randy Kirner has stated that Nevada is projected to have a $1.5 billion revenue shortfall in 2011.
One of his plans is to drive for making Yucca Mountain into a world-class research and development center.
“Nevada is the perfect location and we already have the technology and workers with the necessary skills,” Kirner said. “Such a start would bring enormous investments and jobs for Nevadans.”
With approximately 77,000 tons of nuclear waste across the nation waiting to be stored in a safe area, something will eventually have to be done. As long as the fearful remain fearful, Yucca Mountain and the billions of dollars already invested in it will have to sit tight.
http://studentdev.jour.unr.edu/bcao/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/nuclear.mov






